Pawan Sir.
We agree. Will deep study and give my comments. 
Well wishes 
Prof Ajit seshadri 
The Vigyan Vijay Foundation 

Dear Kevin and All 
I have studied several such bacterial cultures available in market, claiming to reduce significantly organic matters in pit toilets/septic tanks etc  but could not get any culture as per the claims. 
 I would like to know -(i) what do you mean by industrial application? What type of industrial wastes you used with your culture and (ii) what is the technical explanation of reduction of  coliform by using your cuture.
Best regards
Pawan

Further to my above reply, 

Please see example photos below showing the effect of Bacillus treatment of a very soiled septic tank. Results were achieved in 2 weeks.



Kevin

"Hello,
I concur with what Elisabeth says: there are no enzymes that actually "digest" sludge. And many marketers will try to tell you otherwise.

But I would add that there are specific bacteria that can colonize that do have better abilities to convert sludge solids into gas; although hard to establish thermophilic bacteria can reduce your sludge volumes -- they need high temperatures (obviously) and lots of time exposed to fresh sludge; mesophilic bacteria may be more robust and easier to establish, but don't reduce sludge to the same levels as their thermophilic peers. Again, establishing these efficient colonies and keeping them thriving is a challenge.

Good luck

Jill"

This is simply not true. We are working with Bacillus/enzyme blends that effectively digest/liquify sludge in a large variety of applications ranging from industrial farming, sewage treatment works, septic tanks, and pit toilets. We have applications showing in industrial farming application, sludge results lowered by 70% in a mater of 1 to 2 months.

Not to mention extreme improvements to DO, reduction in COD, reduction in coliform, and also important, extreme reduction in odours.

I am open to talk to anyone about this.

Kind regards
Kevin

Hello all. Many years ago we trialled a system where we used our separated excreta. If you know us, we only build UDDTs. We were using Bacillus Subtillus in the organic mix, generally wood ash, and we noticed there was less 'compost' in the chamber when we emptied it. To a large concrete container added two tonnes of compost and 1,000 litres of urine and left it. It has to be soaked and not dripped (as shown in the photo) because if the urine is dripped it finds its own channels and not all of the compost is soaked. After two weeks we drained the liquid and it was a very dark colour. We had it tested and it contained more nutrients than the urine alone. We lest the remaining 'sludge' and it was eaten by B Subtillus until there were about ten kgs of inert soil left on the bottom.

We never documented it apart from the test, and I add some photos that I hope are self explantory

Hi Daniel,
That's correct. Suppliers will try to tell you otherwise but most likely they would be selling you "snake oil", i.e. nothing useful, just expensive. Please read in the posts about in this thread above for more information.

Regards,
Elisabeth

so there is no additive that at least boosts the activities of microorganisms in the septics to increase digestion of waste?

I was involved in testing a brand new enzyme concoction which has won prizes and had great results from swine farms in the US and Europe. Major water treatment companies are considering working with this product. However, when we tested it in 30 pits, septic tanks and barrels in Uganda, we couldn't get consistent enough results to launch it as a product. One issue was that even if the sludge was digested, it increased the water volume, and due to the enclosed nature of the pits, the water couldn't evaporate. This meant the volume stayed the same even if some sludge was digested. There is also the issue of lack of pit uniformity; porous/porous walls, etc. which all affected the results we got.
I remember an observation from a report that part of the problem could be enzymes are made for different settings (such as swine farms) and so don't cross over well to the pit environment. If research was carried out on understanding the pit environment in much more depth, and an enzyme engineered to work in that environment, there is the possibility that it could be more successful.
As a word of warning, we tested the best-selling Ugandan additive as well as a control against the new additive.

We were told that the best-selling additive could eat everything in the pits, including plastic garbage (even though it was sold in a plastic container!!). Supposedly it was sourced from Germany. It appeared to be little more than paraffin. Worse, there was growing concern from users that it was causing some pits to collapse.

Good luck finding an alternative solution.

Hello,

I concur with what Elisabeth says: there are no enzymes that actually "digest" sludge. And many marketers will try to tell you otherwise.

But I would add that there are specific bacteria that can colonize that do have better abilities to convert sludge solids into gas; although hard to establish thermophilic bacteria can reduce your sludge volumes -- they need high temperatures (obviously) and lots of time exposed to fresh sludge; mesophilic bacteria may be more robust and easier to establish, but don't reduce sludge to the same levels as their thermophilic peers. Again, establishing these efficient colonies and keeping them thriving is a challenge.

Good luck

Jill

Hi Tsepo,
I have just posted my response in the older existing thread about this topic, see here:
forum.susana.org/280-faecal-sludge-treat...es-em?start=36#29035

Regards
Pawan

That would be nice but the short answer is "no, there isn't". Many sales people of pit additives will tell you their product can do it, but it's all bogus and snake oil.
I recommend for you to read this previous thread:
forum.susana.org/280-faecal-sludge-treat...l-sludge-includes-em
(45,000 views by the way! not bad)

And also this Wikipedia article:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_additive

To solve your problem you'll have to either look into safe pit emptying and treatment and disposal of faecal sludge, or maybe conversion to toilets that don't produce sludge, like urine diversion dehydration toilets (UDDTs), see here on the forum:
forum.susana.org/34-urine-diversion-syst...-and-ud-flush-toilet

Regards,
Elisabeth

Good Day

I am based in Lesotho Southern Africa, I would like to know whether there is An enzyme or bacteria that can be manufactured or used to digest the sludge So that it slows the filling up of school pit latrines.

We currently have a problem of land as pit latrines fill up fast and new space or land unavailable

Your assistance highly appreciated

kIND REGARDS TSEPO MACHELA

Sent from Mail for Windows 10