A critical and historical review of latrine siting guidelines

920 views

Page selection:
  • alevy
  • alevy's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Engineer working sanitation since 2018. Interests in decentralized wastewater systems, FSM, sustainable sanitation planning and water and fecal sludge reuse. Ingeniero trabajando en saneamiento desde el 2018. Interesado en sistemas de saneamiento descentralizados, planificación de saneamiento sostenible y reúso de agua y lodos. Aguatuya
  • Posts: 13
  • Likes received: 4

Re: A critical and historical review of latrine siting guidelines

Hi Chriss,
Thanks for sharing. Although many studies have included different (all important) aspects in relation to this particular topic, most have often failed to do it in an integral way. In times where we boast about the powerful tools we have created, modelling around this topic has to be improved.

Critical reviews remind us that knowledge isn't set in stone. We, practitioner professionals, often overlook this.
Alejandro Levy
AGUATUYA

Calle Nicolás Ortiz N° 33 (TESAI of. 1B)
Tel (591) 4 424 2164
Casilla 6264
Cochabamba – Bolivia

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • ChrisNenn
  • Topic Author
  • Posts: 1
  • Likes received: 0

A critical and historical review of latrine siting guidelines

Here's a link to an article some of us at the University of South Florida wrote on why latrine setback distances should not be considered a one-size-fits-all methodology.
iwaponline.com/washdev/article/13/10/833/97930
We know we aren't the first ones to understand this underlying problem, but, to our knowledge, we are the first ones to look at how these guidelines developed and what field papers they use as their reason for a given distance. We hope you find this information useful.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
Page selection:
Share this thread:
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.875 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum