- Forum
- categories
- Markets, finance and governance
- Monitoring and evaluation (M&E), technical standards, certifications
- Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
3936 views
Re: Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Hello SuSanA secretariat,
Thank you for sharing. I would have some follow-up questions:
Gian M.
Thank you for sharing. I would have some follow-up questions:
- How did you select the case study countries Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda?
- Are you planning to expand the study to more countries?
- Are you planning a general synthesis, based on case study findings?
- In the future, it would be great to learn more about concrete actions by in-country institutions (local or national) in charge of implementing national strategies.
Gian M.
Gian Melloni
Development and WASH specialist
REACH programme manager, University of Oxford
reachwater.org.uk/
Development and WASH specialist
REACH programme manager, University of Oxford
reachwater.org.uk/
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You need to login to replyRe: Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Dear Chaiwe and Gian,
Thank you for your interest in the SuSanA desk-review on sanitation monitoring, and of course thank you Carolien, for the great work. The SuSanA secretariat is pleased to announce that the three SuSanA case studies undertaken in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda, as well as the PowerPoint presentation and the recorded presentation of the key findings of these desk reviews have been uploaded to the SuSanA library. The following link will lead you to the aforementioned documents Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies - Resources • SuSanA This desk-review presents concrete examples to understand better the framework and requirements around the topic of sanitation monitoring, with the aim to contribute to the achievement of SDG 6.2 and 6.3 through better and more frequent sanitation monitoring.
We are looking forward to your feedback on the content and outcomes of the 3 case studies and would be happy to pursue the discussions on the topic of monitoring SDG 6.2 and 6.3 on this forum thread.
Kind Regards,
SuSanA Secretariat
Thank you for your interest in the SuSanA desk-review on sanitation monitoring, and of course thank you Carolien, for the great work. The SuSanA secretariat is pleased to announce that the three SuSanA case studies undertaken in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda, as well as the PowerPoint presentation and the recorded presentation of the key findings of these desk reviews have been uploaded to the SuSanA library. The following link will lead you to the aforementioned documents Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies - Resources • SuSanA This desk-review presents concrete examples to understand better the framework and requirements around the topic of sanitation monitoring, with the aim to contribute to the achievement of SDG 6.2 and 6.3 through better and more frequent sanitation monitoring.
We are looking forward to your feedback on the content and outcomes of the 3 case studies and would be happy to pursue the discussions on the topic of monitoring SDG 6.2 and 6.3 on this forum thread.
Kind Regards,
SuSanA Secretariat
Posted by a member of the SuSanA secretariat held by the GIZ Sector Program Water Policy – Innovations for Resilience
Located at Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Bonn, Germany
Follow us on facebook: www.facebook.com/susana.org, linkedin: www.linkedin.com/company/sustainable-sanitation-alliance-susana and twitter: twitter.com/susana_org
Located at Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Bonn, Germany
Follow us on facebook: www.facebook.com/susana.org, linkedin: www.linkedin.com/company/sustainable-sanitation-alliance-susana and twitter: twitter.com/susana_org
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You need to login to replyRe: Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Hello,
Thank you for sharing. Is a full report available?
Regards,
Gian M.
Thank you for sharing. Is a full report available?
Regards,
Gian M.
Gian Melloni
Development and WASH specialist
REACH programme manager, University of Oxford
reachwater.org.uk/
Development and WASH specialist
REACH programme manager, University of Oxford
reachwater.org.uk/
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You need to login to reply- Chaiwe
-
- Moderator
- Innovation enthusiast and Knowledge Management Expert in WASH and Climate Change while cross-cutting Youth and Gender Issues. CEO of CaDev_Capacity Development (An African Social Enterprise)
Less- Posts: 327
- Karma: 8
- Likes received: 113
Re: Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Dear Carolien,
I would like to start by saying welcome to the SuSanA forum as of September this past year. A very informative first post.
Zambia is in the process of conducting their Joint Water Sector Review (JWSR) for this year, the process began already last year and interestingly Uganda come up in discussion on a number of occassions as a case example based on how effective and efficient their JWSR processes is. I can assume that this could be one of the reasons you selected them in your investigation?
Could you share a little bit more about how Uganda has institutionalised their sector monitoring processes? For example, are all responsible decentralised structures responsible and capacitated to collect and report sector performance information? or is the process outsourced to a consulting firm? Zambia's last JWSR was done in 2018 before this year, how has Uganda managed to do this annually (i assume)?
It would be great to have a detailed report if you have one.
Regards,
Chaiwe
I would like to start by saying welcome to the SuSanA forum as of September this past year. A very informative first post.
Zambia is in the process of conducting their Joint Water Sector Review (JWSR) for this year, the process began already last year and interestingly Uganda come up in discussion on a number of occassions as a case example based on how effective and efficient their JWSR processes is. I can assume that this could be one of the reasons you selected them in your investigation?
Could you share a little bit more about how Uganda has institutionalised their sector monitoring processes? For example, are all responsible decentralised structures responsible and capacitated to collect and report sector performance information? or is the process outsourced to a consulting firm? Zambia's last JWSR was done in 2018 before this year, how has Uganda managed to do this annually (i assume)?
It would be great to have a detailed report if you have one.
Regards,
Chaiwe
SuSanA Forum Moderator
Skat Foundation (With financial support by GIZ and SIRWASH up to November 2023)
Chaiwe Mushauko-Sanderse BSc. NRM, MPH
Independent consultant located in Lusaka, Zambia
Emails: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/chaiwe-mushauko-sanderse-21709129/
Twitter: @ChaiweSanderse
Skat Foundation (With financial support by GIZ and SIRWASH up to November 2023)
Chaiwe Mushauko-Sanderse BSc. NRM, MPH
Independent consultant located in Lusaka, Zambia
Emails: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/chaiwe-mushauko-sanderse-21709129/
Twitter: @ChaiweSanderse
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You need to login to reply- Cvandervoorden
-
Topic AuthorLess
- Posts: 1
- Likes received: 1
Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
As we all know, monitoring is key to advancing sanitation for all. As a step towards exploring deeper SuSanA engagement on SDG 6.2 and 6.3 monitoring, in September 2021 the Secretariat commissioned me to undertake a rapid desk-review on the state of sanitation monitoring in three diverse countries; and to understand the institutions, actors, processes and mechanisms involved. Herewith find an overview presentation, summarizing the findings from the three countries. Looking forward to hearing your reactions, and suggestions for SuSanA on how to take work and discussion on this topic forward!
This attachment is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.
Please log in or register to see it.
This message has an attachment file.
Please log in or register to see it.
The following user(s) like this post: Chaiwe
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You need to login to reply
Share this thread:
- Forum
- categories
- Markets, finance and governance
- Monitoring and evaluation (M&E), technical standards, certifications
- Monitoring SDG targets 6.2 and 6.3 in Bolivia, Jordan and Uganda - brief case studies
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.059 seconds