Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

1273 views

  • kimmee22
  • kimmee22's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • M&E Specialist, Capacity Developer, Project Manager | Founder & Principal of FLUSH
  • Posts: 18
  • Likes received: 10

Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

Hey all,

Just wanted to inform you that earlier this week our research team published with Sage Journals an article about systemic inequalities in sanitation's leadership. Our team researched to ask if the sanitation sector's leadership is lacking diversity. The results, in a word, indicated the answer was "yes". 

The article is open access here:  journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/11786302211031846

The abstract is as follows: 

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the global sanitation sector have not been the subject of extensive investigation or scrutiny. However, without diverse leadership, the sector will continue to experience failure, inefficient use of dwindling resources, and overall low sanitation coverage rates, with 2 billion people lacking sanitation access. This research presents the first quantitative study of sanitation leadership demographics. The results revealed that older, white males from High-Income Countries comprised over a third of all leadership positions. This research found that two-thirds of all sanitation leaders were white, with white leaders 8.7 times more likely to hold multiple positions across different organizations than Black, Indigenous, or other People of Color. Eighty-eight out of one hundred organizations were headquartered in a High-Income Country, and western institutions dominated education data. Black, Indigenous, and other Women of Color were the least represented group, highlighting the importance of an intersectional perspective when discussing gender and racial equality. These issues must be urgently addressed if the Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 targets are to be met effectively. Institutional reform, inclusive hiring policies, and transforming individual attitudes are starting points for change. More organizational data should be made available, and further research needs to be conducted on these topics if a change is to be seen in time for 2030.

Enjoy the read!
--
NYU BS '08 | NYU MPA '10 | IWC/UQ MIWM '16
Sanitation Services Consultant & Edutainer
Founder, FLUSH LLC
You need to login to reply
  • Chaiwe
  • Chaiwe's Avatar
  • Independent consultant (strategic planning, project management and M&E in WASH, climate action and, gender and HIV) and Part-time Solid Waste Management Lecturer at the University of Zambia.
  • Posts: 217
  • Karma: 8
  • Likes received: 62

Re: Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

Dear Kim,

Thank you for sharing this publication. 

I keep second-guessing myself about the meaning of SDG 6.2 leadership, especially when I read the part about 'White Male domination vs other groups etc''. This is probably because I may not be preview to the sample used for the research and i come from a different geographical context.

Could you share a little more about the definition and what constitutes  SDG 6.2 leadership?

Kind Regards,
Chaiwe
SuSanA Forum Moderator
(With financial support by GIZ from June to October 2021)

Chaiwe Mushauko-Sanderse BSc. NRM, MPH
Independent consultant located in Lusaka, Zambia
Emails: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/chaiwe-mushauko-sanderse-21709129/
Twitter: @ChaiweSanderse

You need to login to reply
  • kimmee22
  • kimmee22's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • M&E Specialist, Capacity Developer, Project Manager | Founder & Principal of FLUSH
  • Posts: 18
  • Likes received: 10

Re: Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

Hi Chaiwe,

In our methodology section, we defined leadership groups for this research: 

"The research team collected demographic information for 1472 unique individuals on the board, leadership team, and/or heads of sanitation teams for the list’s sanitation organizations."

The word leadership means different things across the literature, which is why we waited until the methodology section to define how we saw it in our research. Hope that helps!

Thanks,
K
--
NYU BS '08 | NYU MPA '10 | IWC/UQ MIWM '16
Sanitation Services Consultant & Edutainer
Founder, FLUSH LLC
You need to login to reply
  • Elisabeth
  • Elisabeth's Avatar
  • I'm passionate about SuSanA's role in the WASH sector since about 2005. I'm a freelance consultant since 2012 (former roles: program manager, lecturer, process engineer for wastewater treatment plants)
  • Posts: 3329
  • Karma: 54
  • Likes received: 905

Re: Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

Dear Kimberly.

Thanks to the authors of this paper ( Kimberly Worsham Ruth Sylvester Georgia Hales Kelsey McWilliams Euphresia Luseka ) for doing this interesting and detailed analysis. I think a lot of the findings are probably in no way unique to the WASH sector, e.g. the low percentage of female CEOs, top managers etc. is well known - everywhere in the world and in all sectors. In addition to the male/female thing one could also investigate women with children versus women without children, as I think it's generally harder for women with children to hold down those high-pressure, long-hour jobs. Some of them might deliberately say "no" to that. I would be one of them. Could it be that work-life balance is more important for many mothers with young children than it is for fathers with young children? Anyhow, I am digressing. (but I recommend to anyone to follow the account "Manwhohasitall" on twitter, Facebook or instagram, it's a very revealing satirical account which reverses the roles).

There are two things I would possibly slightly question in your paper: In your conclusion you say "Western HICs continue to dominate all aspects of sanitation leadership.". I find the term "sanitation leadership" rather ill-defined (just like Chaiwe said, too). Sanitation can be so many things (including local businesses for solid waste transport for example) but you seem to have zoomed in on the whole donor/aid/development cooperation thing.  So shouldn't the statement rather be "Western HICs continue to dominate the top level management positions of organisations that provide aid in the WASH sector?." Also, isn't it somewhat logical that if the money is provided by HICs that there are more people from HICs in the leadership positions of those organisations? I guess it comes down to the whole aid system, questions over aid effectiveness, is aid creating dependencies etc.  (as a starting point see the Wikipedia article about criticism of aid:  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aid#Criticism )

My second point is this statement of yours in the abstract: 

However, without diverse leadership, the sector will continue to experience failure, inefficient use of dwindling resources, and overall low sanitation coverage rates, with 2 billion people lacking sanitation access.

Do we have any scientific evidences that even with diverse leadership, the sector would not experience failure, inefficient use of dwindling resources, and overall low sanitation coverage rates? One might hope so but do we really have evidence? I remember reading articles that companies whose boards have a better gender balance make better investment decisions. But is there similar evidence to show that boards that have a more diverse make-up of gender, nationalities, ethnicity, educational background, with/without disabilities, age would result in a more functional WASH sector? What if the problems are more at the political level of the LMICs, i.e. much broader than what WASH sector professionals can influence?

Regards,
Elisabeth
Head moderator of this Discussion Forum
(with financial support by GIZ from July to November 2021)

Dr. Elisabeth von Muench
Independent consultant located in Ulm, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Twitter: @EvMuench
Founder of WikiProject Sanitation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sanitation
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
The following user(s) like this post: paresh
You need to login to reply
  • kimmee22
  • kimmee22's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • M&E Specialist, Capacity Developer, Project Manager | Founder & Principal of FLUSH
  • Posts: 18
  • Likes received: 10

Re: Research Publication: Is diversity missing from SDG 6.2 leadership?

Hi Elisabeth,

Thanks for this. I think it's worthwhile to take a step back from these comments to note a few things:
  • While the findings are not necessarily unique to the WASH sector in sentiment, it is the responsibility of those in the WASH sector to address their diversity issues. We felt it important to provide information about the sector's status as a baseline so that this dialogue may move forward and beyond pledges.
  • The WASH and overall development sectors do not have sufficient literature about DEI - most of our research comes from corporate industries. We were not trying to check all of the boxes in this research - we were merely trying to start building evidence for the sector by starting from the first step - conducting a baseline.
  • We were in no way trying to do all of the things in this study. Our research team was entirely voluntary, and to make sure we could do something meaningful and focused, we kept our scope to gender, race, and countries of origin. While assessing parenthood could have been part of our research, we believe it could have overburdened the key points we were looking to assess and muddle the message.
  • Our primary hypothesis was that sanitation leadership is white and male; our results showed that women of color are significantly underrepresented.
To answer your comments:
  • On SuSanA, we have had discussions about defining sanitation before since it can be tricky to define well and in a way that everyone can agree with. Again, we opted to stick to sanitation in terms of fecal waste management and toilets because of our scope, though many of the organizations we assessed also manage solid waste management. It wasn't WASH-focused because we didn't look at organizations working in water or hygiene, and it would have been misleading. Also, many of the organizations we studied do not necessarily provide aid, but may work on research and advocacy, facilitation, or inclusive sanitation advocacy across many geographies. Therefore, we were not talking about aid as a whole, and we did not feel it made sense to define our research in that way.
  • We are currently looking to source funding for the second phase of research that would assess the performance and effectiveness of sanitation efforts with diversity in leadership. However, there are no studies currently specific to sanitation - as mentioned in the paper, we have seen it in other industries and can extrapolate for now.
  • You've pointed out that if money is coming from HICs, it makes sense for leaders to come from those organizations. This is one of the problems we're trying to address in the paper - that we need to remember why this is the case (years of colonialism of which the power structures are still intact today) and the efforts we need to make to undo this. 
Thanks,
Kim & the other authors
--
NYU BS '08 | NYU MPA '10 | IWC/UQ MIWM '16
Sanitation Services Consultant & Edutainer
Founder, FLUSH LLC
The following user(s) like this post: paresh
You need to login to reply
Share this thread:
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.251 seconds