- Sanitation systems
- Faecal sludge management (FSM)
- Determining helminth egg quantities (measurement techniques)
- Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?
Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?
34.7k views

Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

joeturner wrote: I'm not suggesting everyone should do this, because it is very expensive. But there has been a considerable argument about the value of using E.coli as a measure, and I'd say the consensus is that on its own it doesn't really show anything very much.
My "why not?" was an honest question, because I don't know much about this considerable argument you are referring to. So I'd be interested in some info about this, a link would do.
Thanks, Florian
- joeturner
-
Less
- Posts: 717
- Karma: 23
- Likes received: 184
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

The 'why not' is hard to answer - but basically it doesn't model the breakdown of pathogens very well.
This is another relevant paper from Harwood et al
- KeithBell
-
- User is blocked
Less- Posts: 97
- Karma: -10
- Likes received: 15
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

What happens when these parasites find their way to the intestines of people? Do they then consume commensal gut flora?
water.me.vccs.edu/courses/ENV295Micro/lesson6_5.htm
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916409010923
www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1125...3373797#.U2ASeOZdV9s
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

In my opinion this post does not fit into this thread, it is off topic. We already had a discussion about ciliate protozoans and wastewater treatment plants here on the forum:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/39-any...mit=12&start=24#6833
If you want to discuss it further, please do it in that other thread, not here.
Independent consultant located in Ulm, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Twitter: @EvMuench
Founder of WikiProject Sanitation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sanitation
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
- PatrickBBB
-
- Water and environment engineer.
Less- Posts: 14
- Karma: 3
- Likes received: 7
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

I totally agree with you that hygiene practice and following well documented guidelines is necessary, but I do not think that they should replace monitoring. Yes, I agree that it may be too much to ask for the end-user to conduct the monitoring himself, but this is where community based organizations might play a role.In general, I'm not so concinced in the utility or the need for the end user of having some montitoring tools that measure the actual indicator organisms. I think often it is much more practical and useful to use simple and easy to control "indicator actions", behaviours or pracitices that are known to lead to a safe result.
E.g. for handwashing. One could aim at useing some fancy tools to do a bacteria count on washed hands to see if washing was effective, or one could aim at a behaviour known to be suffciently safe (e.g. wash hands before cooking and eating, after toilet use, for 1 min, using soap.).
For helminth removal that would be to rather aim at measuring storagte time, treatment temperature that need to be respected than at measureing the helminths directly.

- KeithBell
-
- User is blocked
Less- Posts: 97
- Karma: -10
- Likes received: 15
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

muench wrote: Note by moderator (EvM) regarding Keith's post above:
In my opinion this post does not fit into this thread, it is off topic. We already had a discussion about ciliate protozoans and wastewater treatment plants here on the forum:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/39-any...mit=12&start=24#6833
If you want to discuss it further, please do it in that other thread, not here.
I beg to differ, Elisabeth. The question in this thread is "What pathogens should we test?" and protozoans are used as indicator in activated sludge for good reason. It's quite pertinent to this discussion.
Also, continuing to discuss protozoans in a thread about anammox bacteria isn't appropriate, so if you'd prefer, I'd be happy to begin a new thread devoted to the issue of protozoans, especially ciliates, but we can also discuss malaria.
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

But I still not agree that helminths (e.g. Ascaris) would be a better indicator. At least E.Coli or FC is much more close to the behaviour of bacterial pathogens in the environment than are worm eggs.
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

The problem is though that you can't know the range before so you have to do several dilutions, and to be statistically correct even multiples of those. All of which is problematic in a non full-lab setting.
That said, the reason for taking Ascaris as far as I know, is that in heat disinfection processes (and maybe composting ones?) those are about the most durable, i.e. if none of those survive, pretty much all pathogenic bacteria and viruses can be assumed to be dead too.
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

JKMakowka wrote: That said, the reason for taking Ascaris as far as I know, is that in heat disinfection processes (and maybe composting ones?) those are about the most durable, i.e. if none of those survive, pretty much all pathogenic bacteria and viruses can be assumed to be dead too.
This is true for this type of treatment (but simply measuring temperature would be more practical), however, as I said above, in some treatment systems, especially for wastewater, helminth eggs may be much easier retained as bacteria.
- joeturner
-
Less
- Posts: 717
- Karma: 23
- Likes received: 184
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

JKMakowka wrote: That said, the reason for taking Ascaris as far as I know, is that in heat disinfection processes (and maybe composting ones?) those are about the most durable, i.e. if none of those survive, pretty much all pathogenic bacteria and viruses can be assumed to be dead too.
This is also my understanding - if we are to choose a single indicator, it seems best to choose the one which is hardest to destroy.
I can agree it isn't perfect, but it seems to me to be the best available option.
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

Florian wrote:
JKMakowka wrote: That said, the reason for taking Ascaris as far as I know, is that in heat disinfection processes (and maybe composting ones?) those are about the most durable, i.e. if none of those survive, pretty much all pathogenic bacteria and viruses can be assumed to be dead too.
This is true for this type of treatment (but simply measuring temperature would be more practical), however, as I said above, in some treatment systems, especially for wastewater, helminth eggs may be much easier retained as bacteria.
True, but the problem with measuring heat is that that is only an very indirect measure and can be easily messed up by measuring at the wrong point or if the material is not properly mixed.
- joeturner
-
Less
- Posts: 717
- Karma: 23
- Likes received: 184
Re: Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?

Florian wrote:
This is true for this type of treatment (but simply measuring temperature would be more practical), however, as I said above, in some treatment systems, especially for wastewater, helminth eggs may be much easier retained as bacteria.
I actually think temperature is more difficult to measure - because to meet standards you'd have to be able to prove that every part of your compost has reached the required temperature for the required time and there is no possibility of reinoculation. Which would be hard to prove without using thermocouples and a data recorder. It seems to me to be a bit of a myth that one can monitor the temperature of a compost windrow with a single temperature probe.
- Sanitation systems
- Faecal sludge management (FSM)
- Determining helminth egg quantities (measurement techniques)
- Wanting a better way to test pathogen inactivation? Us too! Can you help me crowdsource a better way?