VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

2797 views

  • goeco
  • goeco's Avatar
  • Self employed innovator with an interest in wastewater treatment systems and recycling of nutrients
  • Posts: 293
  • Karma: 7
  • Likes received: 172

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

Hi Hajo,
the 20g/m3 comes from the NZ standard for surface irrigation. This seems to vary between countries, usually between 10 and 30 g/m3. However, this is NOT a standard for irrigating food crops. It certainly would be suitable for irrigating tree crops or banana palms, but not lettuces! I'm not sure what level of suspended solids equates to <1 helminth ova per litre, but the evidence is that secondary vermifiltration is very efficient at removing helminths. I assume that is because helminth ova are sticky and attach to the biofilm. I tend to use the "simple clarity test" for suspended solids... if the treated wastewater is clear then the suspended solids have been removed. The SV removes both suspended (filter action) and dissolved solids (biological action), whereas the PD doesn't. It just removes most of the solids. But my point is that if the PD is straight underneath the flush toilet, only a small proportion of the solids become suspended. Mix everything through sewers and I assume the suspended solids percentage will become higher.

cheers
Dean
Dean Satchell, M For. Sc.
Vermifilter.com
www.vermifilter.com
The following user(s) like this post: hajo
You need to login to reply
  • hajo
  • hajo's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Director of catWASH: consultancy, advice, training in WASH. Late but not too late I have founded my own consultancy hoping to provide useful advice and training in construction, O&M, management and governance of water and sanitation in Rwanda and in the region.
  • Posts: 242
  • Karma: 14
  • Likes received: 108

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

hi Dean,

sorry, have been very busy on other things but VC is always at the back of my mind.

Where can I easily read up the WHO condition for the use of waste water for irrigation, either on trees or on uncooked edible veggies? Can you direct me to a relevant literature?

Why do you quote the '<1 helminth ova per litre'? Is it one of the WHO criteria?

The removal of suspended and dissolved removal of solids in sewage by PD and SV is clear. And that effluent from a drop toilet contains less suspended solids because of the lacking 'mixing action' in the sewer, is also understood.

We discussed earlier that PD (and SV) need some time to build up their efficiency, and even up to 6 to 12 months. This may be especially valid where we use PD for clearing sewage because of the high suspension and the subsequent low solid content. My interpretation: the wood bark is too coarse and it takes long that filter action by the PD is build up as pores in the wood bark close slowly with humus. What would you recommend speeding up the filter efficiency? Mixing of wood bark with saw dust? Adding more worms reducing their multiplication time?

Is it correct to assume that a PD under a household drop toilet will go into 'action' almost immediately because the faeces are (almost) not suspended? Yes, also the household PD will let through some more suspended solids in the beginning until the humus has built up to a reasonable filter, but much less suspended solids in the effluent than under a sewage PD in the beginning, isn't it?

Why I ask? Because I am not building a VC system for my own use where I probably will take interest and check daily how the worms and the VC are doing. I plan to build VC systems for others who only have the interest for a functioning toilet/treatment without paying attention to its proper operation. (No German household shows any interest in what happens after the flush!) And I cannot check the proper operation of multiple systems every day, I must rely that I can install the system such, that it requires checking only once a month (or once a week at most). Thus, an 'as good as possible' PD function from the start is paramount.

ciao
Hajo
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
Albert Einstein
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of a genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
E.F. Schumacher
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. :-)
Albert Einstein
You need to login to reply
  • Elisabeth
  • Elisabeth's Avatar
  • I'm passionate about SuSanA's role in the WASH sector since about 2005. I'm a freelance consultant since 2012 (former roles: program manager, lecturer, process engineer for wastewater treatment plants)
  • Posts: 3064
  • Karma: 54
  • Likes received: 837

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

Hi Hajo,
You asked about WHO Guidelines. Did you mean the ones from 2006 or something more recent?

The ones from 2006 are here:
WHO (2006). WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater (Volume IV: Excreta and greywater use in agriculture). World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN: 92 4 154685 9
https://www.susana.org/en/knowledge-hub/resources-and-publications/library/details/1004

The criterion of "less than 1 helminth ova per litre" was mentioned in there. But the guidelines were supposed to be adapted for each country.
Not sure if this helps.

Regards,
Elisabeth
Head moderator of this Discussion Forum
(under consultancy contract with Skat Foundation funded by WSSCC)

Dr. Elisabeth von Muench
Independent consultant located in Brisbane, Australia
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Twitter: @EvMuench
Founder of WikiProject Sanitation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sanitation
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
You need to login to reply
  • goeco
  • goeco's Avatar
  • Self employed innovator with an interest in wastewater treatment systems and recycling of nutrients
  • Posts: 293
  • Karma: 7
  • Likes received: 172

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

Hi Hajo,
The maximum 1 helminth egg per litre originally comes from 1989 WHO guidelines for irrigation of crops, pasture and trees. This is equivalent to a removal efficiency of up to 99.9% and also serves as an indicator for other pathogens such as protozoan cysts. The guidelines appear to have been designed for what is achievable using well designed waste stabilisation ponds. Apparently the WHO recommendations are not zero risk, but are more pragmatic.

The efficiency of the secondary vermifilter builds up quite quickly (a couple of weeks), this is achieved by the biological slime that builds up on the media rather than the presence of worms. The worms also digest the accumulated solids in the primary digester, so the sooner the population builds up the sooner digestion reaches an equilibrium with incoming solids. So yes, adding plenty of worms will get reproduction happening faster in the early stages.


The issue with solids in suspension is that the liquids are held for longer on top of the primary digester media. That is, it takes a few days for the water to drain out of sludge. It's difficult to form a mound with thin sludge because of the high water content in the solids, it spreads out on the surface as a mud layer and only drains slowly. Once there is a layer over the whole media, surface drainage is impeded. Contrast that to freshly flushed solids, which are sufficiently solid to form a low wide mound. The water runs down the side of the mound and drains through the media at the perimeter of the mound.


It's not about the coarseness of the media, but ensuring that the media is not completely coated with a layer of mud from accumulated suspended solids. Yes, the primary digester should use a fairly coarse media with good drainage, but worms add humus to this, which is finer... but importantly still drains. But add a layer of mud on the whole surface and you impede drainage. The primary digester should have a low, wide mound of solids in the middle, but the perimeter of this mound should never get to cover the whole surface area of the media.


For your community-scale primary digester the inlet must be positioned so the sludge doesn't spread to coat the whole surface area of the media, but the mound builds in a fashion that allows the water to drain. This might require no maintenance at all, like a domestic primary digester, but I don't have any experience with a community-scale digester. You might find the inlet needs to be moved at intervals.


cheers
Dean
Dean Satchell, M For. Sc.
Vermifilter.com
www.vermifilter.com
The following user(s) like this post: hajo
You need to login to reply
  • hajo
  • hajo's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Director of catWASH: consultancy, advice, training in WASH. Late but not too late I have founded my own consultancy hoping to provide useful advice and training in construction, O&M, management and governance of water and sanitation in Rwanda and in the region.
  • Posts: 242
  • Karma: 14
  • Likes received: 108

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

hi Elisabeth,

thanks for the link to the WHO guideline 2006...  i have downloaded them...  700 pages!...  and partially not in searchable format...  I have transformed them to editable PDF...  and when I have time I'll search for ascaris and helminth...

ciao Hajo
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
Albert Einstein
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of a genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
E.F. Schumacher
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. :-)
Albert Einstein
You need to login to reply
  • hajo
  • hajo's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Director of catWASH: consultancy, advice, training in WASH. Late but not too late I have founded my own consultancy hoping to provide useful advice and training in construction, O&M, management and governance of water and sanitation in Rwanda and in the region.
  • Posts: 242
  • Karma: 14
  • Likes received: 108

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

Hi Dean,

As Elisabeth indicates the 2006 WHO guideline may also refer to the ‘1 helminth egg per litre’, I’ll search for it.

Good to hear that efficiency of VF builds up quickly by the slim development and that efficiency of PD can be influenced positively by increase of worm population in the first place.

Interesting your observations about sewage (99.9% water content) on the PD. First, I want to comment on the requirement that the sludge mound should be concentrated allowing water to drain away at the perimeter of the mound. As the water also carries suspended solids (especially with sewage, possibly less with freshly flushed solids), the perimeter will also get covered with ‘mud’ and slowly the perimeter will increase and increase eventually to the edge of the PD, or?

If I understand you right, we have four layers in the PD from bottom to top: the coarse media of wood bark, the more permeable layer of humus made from worm casting, the less permeable layer of mud from suspended solids in the sewage, and on top the freshly applied sewage.

Should a community-scale PD eventually be designed such that the PD is somehow divided into sections which are fed with fresh sewage one after the other? And the first section only be fed again when the layer of mud has been converted to humus and has become permeable? This will allow the water drain away faster than if the sewage was fed onto mud.

I had already before anticipated that I need to ‘move’ the inflow of sewage onto the PD and had developed an idea how to do it. Let us assume the PD has seven sections, each with its own inlet connected to a manifold. Monday to Sunday, each section gets its ‘shot’ of sewage. After seven days the circle returns to section 1. Because each section had seven days ‘resting’, the water of the sewage percolates quite quickly allowing the worms to feast on the suspended solids. Is one week enough time, for the worms to digest the suspended solids of a thin layer of sewage? If not, I must increase the number of sections or reduce the amount of sewage applied in each ‘shot’. Both will require more PD area. But somehow it should relate to the 0.2 m2/capita which we discussed earlier.

I know we do somehow research work but if I get to build such community-PD, I do not want to start with a size which is completely out of requirements. Therefore, these theoretical discussions.

Ciao
Hajo
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
Albert Einstein
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of a genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
E.F. Schumacher
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. :-)
Albert Einstein
The following user(s) like this post: goeco
You need to login to reply
  • goeco
  • goeco's Avatar
  • Self employed innovator with an interest in wastewater treatment systems and recycling of nutrients
  • Posts: 293
  • Karma: 7
  • Likes received: 172

Re: VermiComposting (digesters and filters) in Kigali, Rwanda

Hi Hajo,

Interesting your observations about sewage (99.9% water content) on the PD.

No... to reach 1 egg per litre, 99.9% of helminth eggs need to be removed from sewage.

The solids component in piped sewage will be highly mixed and saturated with water, thus spreading as a thin layer over the whole surface of the PD as more sewage enters the digester. The water in this "homogenised" sewage will slowly drain, leaving a layer of fine solids on the surface ("mud"). Provided you have a good population of worms they will rapidly digest this layer from underneath, perhaps even in a couple of days.

You could install a distribution manifold and digester sections. The shelter cloth used to line the floor of the digester would go up the drainage walls and retain the solids. You might find that you can keep piping sewage into the digester once it pools. I've done that with my domestic digester, I pumped a homogenised thin sludge into the digester until the water level was 30cm above the media surface. This doesn't drown the worms because it remains aerobic below the layer of sludge, provided the digester is ventilated underneath (e.g. plastic pallet false floor). In my case it took a day or two to drain to a mud. So reciprocating between several digester sections sounds feasible, or even just two, but just remember that regardless of number of sections, total surface area is what matters the most, more is always better... and don't divide digester sections so worms can't migrate between them. Indeed, a thin spread out layer would be digested more efficiently than a mound of the same quantity.

If I understand you right, we have four layers in the PD from bottom to top: the coarse media of wood bark, the more permeable layer of humus made from worm casting, the less permeable layer of mud from suspended solids in the sewage, and on top the freshly applied sewage.

Mostly correct. Humus will be mixed through the coarse bark media but does tend to build up on top of the media. Humus is less permeable than coarse bark, but is still permeable. The layer of impermeable mud only accumulates if the solids in piped sewage are too thin to form a mound, so you will either have a mound with a perimeter, or a layer of mud... but not both, depending on the consistency of the influent. Neither are permeable.

cheers
Dean
Dean Satchell, M For. Sc.
Vermifilter.com
www.vermifilter.com
You need to login to reply
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.260 seconds