Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India (Odisha, 2005–2016)


Page selection:
  • Elisabeth
  • Elisabeth's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Freelance consultant since 2012 (former roles: program manager at GIZ and SuSanA secretariat, lecturer, process engineer for wastewater treatment plants)
  • Posts: 3372
  • Karma: 54
  • Likes received: 931

Re: Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India,

Nice to see: a rare case of a long-term studto to investigate how things are looking 10 years after an intervention took place (a CLTS campaign in this case).
Results are in line with what you would expect - called "ODF slippage"... CLTS alone cannot be the magic bullet, maintenance and rehabilitation of toilets as well as long-term, lasting behaviour change are still big challenges!
Dr. Elisabeth von Muench
Freelance consultant on environmental and climate projects
Located in Ulm, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/elisabethvonmuench/

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • fppirco
  • fppirco's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • I am independent EH&S researcher in natural resources recovery ,water,wastewater,agro_food ...fields.
  • Posts: 98
  • Karma: 1
  • Likes received: 22

Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India,

Copied from www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/97/8/18-221572.pdf?ua=1

Long-term impact of a community-led sanitation campaign in India, 2005–2016Jennifer Orgill-Meyer,a Subhrendu K Pattanayak,b Namrata Chindarkar,c Katherine L Dickinson,d Upendra Panda,eShailesh Rai,f Barendra Sahoo,e Ashok Singhae & Marc Jeulandb

To evaluate the long-term impact of a community-led total sanitation campaign in rural India.

Local organizations in Odisha state, India worked with researchers to evaluate a community-led total sanitation campaign, which aimed to increase the demand for household latrines by raising awareness of the social costs of poor sanitation. The intervention ran from February to March 2006 in 20 randomly-selected villages and 20 control villages. Within sampled villages, we surveyed a random subset of households (around 28 households per village) at baseline in 2005 and over the subsequent 10-year period. We analysed changes in latrine ownership, latrine functionality and open defecation among approximately 1000 households. We estimated linear probability models that examined differences between households in intervention and control villages in 2006, 2010 and 2016.

In 2010, 4 years after the intervention, ownership of latrines was significantly higher (29.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, CI: 17.5 to 41.2) and open defecation was significantly lower (−6.8 percentage points; 95% CI: −13.1 to −1.0) among households in intervention villages, relative to controls. In 2016, intervention households continued to have higher rates of ever owning a latrine (26.3 percentage points; 95% CI: 20.9 to 31.8 ). However, latrine functionality and open defecation were no longer different across groups, due to both acquisition of latrines by control households and abandonment and deterioration of latrines in intervention homes.

Future research should investigate how to maintain and rehabilitate latrines and how to sustain long-term behaviour change.

Researcher and consultant
The following user(s) like this post: JKMakowka, MarcusErridge

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
Page selection:
Share this thread:
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.077 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum