×
Notice
THE FORUM IS IN READ ONLY MODE. We migrate our server. We hope that everything will run smoothly and that we will be fully functional by the middle of next week.
- Forum
- categories
- Sanitation systems
- Toilets without urine diversion
- Pit latrines (simple, VIP, dual pit, pour flush)
- Do pour flush toilets produce a pathogen free sludge (twin pit alternating)?
Do pour flush toilets produce a pathogen free sludge (twin pit alternating)?
22.8k views
Re: RE: pour flush toilets, pit content?
Hi,
I assume pk jha refers to the twin pit system that is popular in India, where one pit is sealed off when full and only emptied after a certain time (here 3 years). That means no addition of fresh pathogens since 3 years. akvopedia.org/wiki/Twin_Pits_for_Pour_Flush
We should consider the safety of the materials no worse than material collected in a UDDT with a total withholding period of 3 years (e.g. 1/2 in the vault, 2 1/2 years outside).
Following the generally used recommendations, material 3 years old is ok for agriculture resuse, keeping in mind the necessity of addtional safety barriers (protective clothes, crop restriction etc.) because some (very few) pathogens may remain.
The post was made in the context of manual scavenging, and there I agree: manual removal of fresh sludge (e.g. from a single pit toilet) is hugely different from 3 years old sludge from a twin-pit system.
Regards,
Florian
I assume pk jha refers to the twin pit system that is popular in India, where one pit is sealed off when full and only emptied after a certain time (here 3 years). That means no addition of fresh pathogens since 3 years. akvopedia.org/wiki/Twin_Pits_for_Pour_Flush
We should consider the safety of the materials no worse than material collected in a UDDT with a total withholding period of 3 years (e.g. 1/2 in the vault, 2 1/2 years outside).
Following the generally used recommendations, material 3 years old is ok for agriculture resuse, keeping in mind the necessity of addtional safety barriers (protective clothes, crop restriction etc.) because some (very few) pathogens may remain.
The post was made in the context of manual scavenging, and there I agree: manual removal of fresh sludge (e.g. from a single pit toilet) is hugely different from 3 years old sludge from a twin-pit system.
Regards,
Florian
The following user(s) like this post: Elisabeth, cecile
- Elisabeth
-
- Moderator
- Freelance consultant since 2012 (former roles: program manager at GIZ and SuSanA secretariat, lecturer, process engineer for wastewater treatment plants)
Less- Posts: 3372
- Karma: 54
- Likes received: 931
Re: Reply: India bans human waste scavenging
Dear pk jha,
As you addressed Paul Calvert directly, I e-mailed him about your post. Here is his reply:
++++++++++++
+++++++++++
For those of you who don't know Paul Calvert, here is his website:
www.eco-solutions.org/about_us.html
Dear pk jha, could you please introduce yourself and edit your forum profile so that we know who you are?
You can find tips on how to edit your forum profile here in our help section:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/134-us...-such-as-a-signature
Personally, I really doubt that you could get pathogen free manure from a wet pit - perhaps only if there were no worm eggs in the faeces to start with?? Do you have any evidence/proof that worm eggs were destroyed in the pits of pour flush toilets after 3 years? I would say: no way! (am happy to be proven wrong)
As you addressed Paul Calvert directly, I e-mailed him about your post. Here is his reply:
++++++++++++
Hi Elizabeth, can barely find a minute just now, but I guess the thing is, and PK Jha is such a nice and committed fellow, that in some cases pour flush may yield such material over that time in good drained soil for example. But not always everywhere.
I agree, moving safe material shouldnt be regarded as manual scavenging.
Do post for me if you like! I will be off email for a few days.
best
Paul
+++++++++++
For those of you who don't know Paul Calvert, here is his website:
www.eco-solutions.org/about_us.html
Dear pk jha, could you please introduce yourself and edit your forum profile so that we know who you are?
You can find tips on how to edit your forum profile here in our help section:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/134-us...-such-as-a-signature
Personally, I really doubt that you could get pathogen free manure from a wet pit - perhaps only if there were no worm eggs in the faeces to start with?? Do you have any evidence/proof that worm eggs were destroyed in the pits of pour flush toilets after 3 years? I would say: no way! (am happy to be proven wrong)
Dr. Elisabeth von Muench
Freelance consultant on environmental and climate projects
Located in Ulm, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/elisabethvonmuench/
Freelance consultant on environmental and climate projects
Located in Ulm, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
My Wikipedia user profile: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EMsmile
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/elisabethvonmuench/
Do pour flush toilets produce a pathogen free sludge (twin pit alternating)?
Note by moderator (EvM):
I moved this post into a new thread, it was originally here in the thread on manual scavenging in India:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/39-mis...aste-scavenging#5567
++++++++++++
Dear Paul
In case of pour flush toilets, human excreta ge converted into a pathogen free, odourless manure with very less moisture content after it is taken out 3 years from the closed pit. In some cases people take such manure out of pit and use for agriculture purpose. In other cases people hire labourers to get it cleaned. It should not be regarded as manual scavenging, as it is not in the form of human excreta.
pk jha
I moved this post into a new thread, it was originally here in the thread on manual scavenging in India:
forum.susana.org/forum/categories/39-mis...aste-scavenging#5567
++++++++++++
Dear Paul
In case of pour flush toilets, human excreta ge converted into a pathogen free, odourless manure with very less moisture content after it is taken out 3 years from the closed pit. In some cases people take such manure out of pit and use for agriculture purpose. In other cases people hire labourers to get it cleaned. It should not be regarded as manual scavenging, as it is not in the form of human excreta.
pk jha
Pawan Jha
Chairman
Foundation for Environment and Sanitation
Mahavir Enclave
New Delhi 110045, India
Web: www.foundation4es.org
Linked: linkedin.com/in/drpkjha
Chairman
Foundation for Environment and Sanitation
Mahavir Enclave
New Delhi 110045, India
Web: www.foundation4es.org
Linked: linkedin.com/in/drpkjha
The following user(s) like this post: cecile
Share this thread:
- Forum
- categories
- Sanitation systems
- Toilets without urine diversion
- Pit latrines (simple, VIP, dual pit, pour flush)
- Do pour flush toilets produce a pathogen free sludge (twin pit alternating)?
Time to create page: 0.064 seconds