EPR in Informal Economies – Who Gets the Money?; Nov 26 07:30 PM IST

353 views

Page selection:
  • paresh
  • paresh's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Moderator
  • Budding WASH researcher, especially interested in governance, public policy, finance, politics and social justice. Architect, Urban & Regional planner by training, Ex. C-WAS, India.I am a patient person :)
  • Posts: 365
  • Karma: 7
  • Likes received: 139

Re: EPR in Informal Economies – Who Gets the Money?; Nov 26 07:30 PM IST

Thank you for responding Alexandra.

Sharing this related event titled EPR in Informal Economies – Who Gets the Money? organised by Be Waste wise 

Extended Producer Responsibility is being promoted as a silver bullet, but its effectiveness is far from proven. While in Europe, there may be a small number of organisations collecting and preparing materials for recycling, in markets where waste management services are not formalised, this work is done by tens of thousands of people – often in poor conditions and for excruciatingly little income. So, where brands are paying into EPR systems, but the workers are not feeling any benefit yet, what needs to change?

Zoë Lenkiewicz, Director of the Global Waste Lab, will be exploring the social justice considerations of EPR in Global South contexts with three subject experts.

Date & Time - Nov 26, 2024 07:30 PM IST

Register here:  Webinar Registration - Zoom  

Paresh Chhajed-Picha
Researcher at Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay, India
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Twitter: @Sparsh85
Wikipedia: Sparsh85

Co-moderator of this discussion forum
Attachments:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • AlexandraDubois
  • AlexandraDubois's Avatar
  • Administrator
  • Technical advisor specialized in water, sanitation and hygiene. I work for GIZ since 2012 and have gathered experience in the sub-Saharan region mainly. Since January 2022, I work as an advisor for the “Water Policy Sector Programme - Innovations for Resilience” in Bonn and I am part of the SuSanA secretariat.
  • Posts: 64
  • Karma: 6
  • Likes received: 45

Re: Linking manufacturers with reusers - enforcing extended producer responsibility

Great post, and thank you to Dr. Georges Wainaina, our Knowledge Broker, to raise this essential question about  product life cycle. Few ideas that came to my mind in reponse to the 3 guiding questions:

For Which industries could such a system applied for?
  • Electronics: Given the growing e-waste crisis, it seems sensible to compensate repair shops and recyclers for extending the life of equipment, as well as encouraging repairable products (e.g. smartphones with replaceable parts)
  • Textile: Artisans who turn discarded fabrics into new products and small businesses that promote the use of second-hand goods could also be supported by major brands and the pret-a-porter industry (Zara, H&M, etc.).
Which industries should such a system should certainly not be applied for? 
  • Products like medical or chemical waste involving risks that would require specialized handling.
  • Wastewater and solid waste management: while these sectors are critical to environmental sustainability, they often struggle to break even on basic treatment costs. Adding compensation obligations for resource recovery activities (biogas production, water reuse, etc.) could further strain already limited resources (especially at household's level).
What safeguards should be added when such an arrangement is made?
  • Transparency in how funds from manufacturers are distributed. 
  • Ensuring recycling efforts meet defined standards for environmental impact
Best
Alex
Alexandra Dubois

Technical Advisor
Sector Programme Water Policy – Innovations for Resilience
Division Climate Change, Environment & Infrastructure

GIZ │Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 32
53113 Bonn, Germany

The following user(s) like this post: paresh

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • paresh
  • paresh's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Moderator
  • Budding WASH researcher, especially interested in governance, public policy, finance, politics and social justice. Architect, Urban & Regional planner by training, Ex. C-WAS, India.I am a patient person :)
  • Posts: 365
  • Karma: 7
  • Likes received: 139

Linking manufacturers with reusers - enforcing extended producer responsibility

Hello. 
I came across this very relevant LinkedIn post by Dr George Wainaina related to linking tyre manufacturers with artisans who put them to use for different uses after their intended life.  They delay the arrival of such material at landfills (or crude disposal in many contexts) by extending their material life. I am copying the example below for easy reference (emphasis my own)

In Kenya, artisans make a variety of items using discarded tires. These include sandals that can last for a lot of years in good service. Most of these artisans do not make much from the sales of the products since the market bases they exist in have limited purchasing power. Considering that the artisans provide a big ecosystem service of extending the life of a potential waste product, yet get little out of it, shouldn't they be compensated for this service by the manufacturers?

Why compensation: Some tire manufacturers made a profit of over 1.48 Billion USD last year alone, but do they know where their tires will end up to? The tire market size is huge.  Since tires are pretty traceable brand wise, could tire companies provide a scheme for paying the deficit that the artisans in Africa will never recover So that they can at least lead a decent life. Or should the companies account for the end of life of their products?

I find these questions very relevant, and the idea could be used to enforce extended producer responsibility, at least in a few industries. Adding a few other questions below to gain more insights and pique interest.
  • For Which industries could such a system applied for?
  • Which industries should such a system should certainly not be applied for? 
  • What safeguards should be added when such an arrangement is made? 
Regards
paresh
Paresh Chhajed-Picha
Researcher at Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay, India
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Twitter: @Sparsh85
Wikipedia: Sparsh85

Co-moderator of this discussion forum
The following user(s) like this post: secretariat

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
Page selection:
Share this thread:
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.115 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum