Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

23.7k views

Page selection:
  • Wolfgang Berger
  • Wolfgang Berger's Avatar
  • Publisher and author of a specialist book and various publications on composting toilets; owner of Berger Biotechnik since 1985; project staff of research projects;
  • Posts: 36
  • Karma: 8
  • Likes received: 21

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

Dear all,

Some data concerning toilet paper:
The daily average consumption in Germany is 15g per person, which is 20 toilet papers. This is very high and of course other applications than anal cleansing are included. More realistic seems to be 7g to 10g per person (10 to 13 papers) (Guttormsen u. Pedersen (1978), Naudascher (2000)).

As part of her dissertation (in German), Naudascher investigated the influence of toilet paper towards the C:N ratio in various compositions. The C:N of toilet paper resulted in an average value of 318. There was not much difference in the tests with and without toilet paper, but a small support of carbon and organic, if bark chips were added (Naudascher, Imke: Kompostierung menschlicher Ausscheidungen durch Verwendung biologischer Trockentoiletten (2000), University of Karlsruhe).

Paper has a C:N ratio from 150 to 1000. Asking some manufacturers, before I published the German book "Komposttoiletten" in 2008, a C:N ratio of 1000 was estimated.

I hope, this is of any help.
Greetings

Wolfgang
Wolfgang Berger
BERGER BIOTECHNIK GmbH
Hedenholz 6
24113 Kiel, Germany
tel. +49(0)1724337875

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.berger-biotechnik.de

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • SusannahSoilet
  • SusannahSoilet's Avatar
  • Trying to use biology to recycle wastes and preserve soil fertility. Working on the 'Soilet System'
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: 1
  • Likes received: 8

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

I think it might be relevant to bear in mind that the high C materials (toilet paper vs leaves or sawdust) are very different microbiologically. The leaves and sawdust have an organised structure (to micro-organisms) and contribute a wealth of bacteria and fungi, whereas the toilet paper is highly processed and virtually sterile.
Sewage sludge (if referring to solids after WWT) is usually far too wet to compost, has had the soluble nutrients leached away and is anaerobic, slumping when piled.
Faeces and high C materials from UDDT, collected in a region of low humidity or high temperatures, might end up too dry for composting, though could perhaps be vermicomposted.
Biodigestion of pig wastes with useful by-products is explained here: dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22013094/Pap...o%20Biodigestion.pdf
I feel sanitation could learn from livestock farmers!
The following user(s) like this post: canaday, ande1978

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • RodrigoBIS
  • RodrigoBIS's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • BIS Chile intern, powered by Innsania (Ingeniería en Innovaciones Sanitarias)
  • Posts: 16
  • Likes received: 2

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

Thanks Florian, I changed my mass balance counting an 45% mass/mass carbon on celulose (C6-H10-O5) using the molecular wheights, and 8,9 kg of toilet paper per year. It raises the c:n in one unit in most of the cases, so it's not very much.

Taking in count that and 500 g daily of solid vegetal wastes, 80% moisture, and 4 times the weight in carbon-rich materials, the balance shows ~40% moisture and c:n ratio ~35, with different carbon-rich additives, that in theory, from a nutrient balance in excel, it's an apropriate pre-compost.


But it's important the areation and the liquids, that i'm not counting in this specific analysis, and maybe it's enough to make the composting fail. According to the compost that I have in my yard (that i'm NOT gonna talk about in my paper, or maybe I will?), the compresion after the firt stages in degradation of humid, unstable organis matter, specially fruits (SPECIALLY WATERMELONS), it's enough to make a compost fail. Dude, the smell in my yard was awfull :sick: .

Thanks for the help everybody!!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • joeturner
  • joeturner's Avatar
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: 23
  • Likes received: 185

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

RodrigoBIS wrote: I need to make a full analisis of the choices that I have when you use a UDDT, and for now I would say that dehydrating it's easier, but I need a full answer with calculus, specially how much carbon rich material I have to add and why. I showed in my last post that with mass balance, equilibrating the c:n ratio to the minimal (~20), using diferent additives, there's a lack of moisture when you reach that ratio, that's why there's a need of water, and also, many references, even in Chile, suport that when you're composting faeces.


Rodrigo, nobody can give you a full analysis of materials that are very varied in a particular situation that you are in. I believe that we are all only telling you the same things - that you need to add a lot of carbon to get faeces to compost and that you are unlikely to need to add water to it. In a confined space you are not going to need to add additional water. Even in a large compost windrow it is unusual that you would need to add water to a co-compost of sewage sludge - usually the problem is that it is far too wet.

Is that volume of carbon rich material gonna diminish considerable with the toilet paper?


The C:N ratio might be affected by the addition of toilet paper, but as I have explained to you above, it is very unlikely to help compost the sludge. You need to add other carbon rich material.

I need the carbon content of toilet paper for make the demonstration. The results I posted of additives are in volume, 7 litres of dry leaves it's too much volume for each defecation, the mass proportion it's in the order of 3 with the faeces, and definitely with a proportion of 5 it's gonna like 10 Lt of leaves, too much. so I want to make it less with toilet paper.


Composting is not something you can work out on a spreadsheet Rodrigo. Toilet paper is not significantly going to affect the C:N ratio of the sludge unless you are adding very large amounts of paper. As I explained above, paper and faeces does not compost together well even if you know the exact C:N rations of the materials you are adding in optimal conditions.

But in a composting vault in a toilet, maybe it's gonna make the composting harder I agree, maybe working in the minimal moisture content required for composting will guarantee a good composting, but adording to the mass balance I showed, there's still a lack of moisture (all values are in the order of 20% moisture)


The problem is not too little water, but too much Nitrogen and too little oxygen.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • Florian
  • Florian's Avatar
  • Water and Sanitation Specialist at Skat Consulting Ltd.
  • Posts: 269
  • Karma: 22
  • Likes received: 131

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

RodrigoBIS wrote: I need the carbon content of toilet paper for make the demonstration.


Paper is mostly made up of cellulose, and cellulose has a carbon content of 444 g / kg (assuming zero moisture). Question is how much toilet paper is used typically...

I agree with what Joe said, if you want to really know it, you'll need to measure it. Taking fresh material from existing UDDTs could be good for sampling feaces+ toilet paper.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • Florian
  • Florian's Avatar
  • Water and Sanitation Specialist at Skat Consulting Ltd.
  • Posts: 269
  • Karma: 22
  • Likes received: 131

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

Hi,
there are several difficulties of getting good composting to work inside a toilet. Besides the challenge of maintaining a near optimum C:N ratio and moisture content, the main difficulty is to ensure good aeration. This is not really possible without frequently manually mixing the heap. Another difficulty is to manage the liquids leaking from the composting heap, which is small in quantitiy but highly loaded in organic matter and pathogens, thus you have another waste stream (besides urine and compost) to manage.

All reasons why a dehydration toilet is more easy to handle, the only rule being minimizing liquids getting into the toilet vault.

If you want to do composting, much easier to use UDDTs and then do external co-composting of the dried fecal matter collected from a larger number of UDDTs togehter with other vegetal waste. Then you can do it on a larger scale where moisture and the right mixture of materials can be much easier controlled than in a large number of toilet vaults.

Best regards,
FLorian

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • RodrigoBIS
  • RodrigoBIS's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • BIS Chile intern, powered by Innsania (Ingeniería en Innovaciones Sanitarias)
  • Posts: 16
  • Likes received: 2

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

I need to make a full analisis of the choices that I have when you use a UDDT, and for now I would say that dehydrating it's easier, but I need a full answer with calculus, specially how much carbon rich material I have to add and why. I showed in my last post that with mass balance, equilibrating the c:n ratio to the minimal (~20), using diferent additives, there's a lack of moisture when you reach that ratio, that's why there's a need of water, and also, many references, even in Chile, suport that when you're composting faeces.

Is that volume of carbon rich material gonna diminish considerable with the toilet paper?
I need the carbon content of toilet paper for make the demonstration. The results I posted of additives are in volume, 7 litres of dry leaves it's too much volume for each defecation, the mass proportion it's in the order of 3 with the faeces, and definitely with a proportion of 5 it's gonna like 10 Lt of leaves, too much. so I want to make it less with toilet paper.

But in a composting vault in a toilet, maybe it's gonna make the composting harder I agree, maybe working in the minimal moisture content required for composting will guarantee a good composting, but adording to the mass balance I showed, there's still a lack of moisture (all values are in the order of 20% moisture)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • joeturner
  • joeturner's Avatar
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: 23
  • Likes received: 185

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

Also I'm still not clear why you think adding water will help.

Composting is an aerobic microbiological process. Limiting the amount of oxygen by doing it in a confined space will inevitably lead to sub-optimal conditions and may not achieve the sanitation results or mass reduction you expect.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • joeturner
  • joeturner's Avatar
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: 23
  • Likes received: 185

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

Well a UDDT is a dehydrating toilet and isn't a composting toilet. So you're talking about two different things.

But you are right, to do efficient composting you need large amounts of carbon rich material, I think five times as much as the volume of faeces is a pretty good estimate. Which is one of the reasons composting toilets do not actually work very well in some circumstances.

I'm not sure a composting system is the best for the situation you describe. Why don't you want to just have it as a dehydration toilet?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • RodrigoBIS
  • RodrigoBIS's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • BIS Chile intern, powered by Innsania (Ingeniería en Innovaciones Sanitarias)
  • Posts: 16
  • Likes received: 2

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

I was definitely talking about Urine Diverting composting toilet. For me in this moment, I don't have the resources or the equipment for making measurements of c:n ratio, so I depend on estimations. A few of you said that there's no need of adding water in a composting UDDT because the idea is to keep everythnig dry. That would be right if you're talking about dehydration toilets, but i'm making an analisis in the limitant factor of a composting UDDT. I read in a reference (that cpuldn't find again, sadly), that there's need of adding 4 to 5 times the weight of the faeces of carbon-rich materials for composting. I already have a few conclusions in how hard is to make this unit work, at low investing, with a training of the new user that can't last more than a afternoon. For not keeping my doubt, I started to make mass balances with the carbon, nitrogen,density, volume and moisture content in microsoft excel, mixing faeces with one additive at a time. My first criteria was to leave the C/N ratio a litle higher than 20. The result was HUGE VOLUMES OF RICH CARBON MATERIALS NEEDED, and reduced content of moisture, than can be equilibrated with water adding, reaching ~40% moisture if you add 200 cc of water after each defecation. This huge volumes made me believe that extra carbon from toilets paper can reduce the big amount of carbon-rich materiales needed, and I need the carbon content of toilet paper for making that. Or the other way, add that amoun of carbon-rich material, but instead of water, add the solid waste, that certainly has a lot of water (~80% sounds fine for me). It sounds crazy but the mass balance says that.I share you a few data in the input and the output, I think that maybe can be a mistake in the data.

Considering
-Faeces: 70% moisture, 150 [g] each defecation, c:n =8, %N=7%

I wrote the input, and the results of increasing the volume added until c:n its the minimal (~20)

Sawdust: 8% moisture, density 80[g/Lt],c:N 511, %N=11%.
-Results: 32% moisture, c:n 20 if 3 litres after each defecation is added.

Dry leaves: 10% moisture, density 70[g/Lt], c:n 54, %N=7%
-Results: 26% moisture,c:n 20 if 6 litres of leaves are added.

Thatch: 10% moisture, density 70 [g/Lt], c:n 80, %N=0,7%
-Results: 28% moisture, C:N 22 if 5 litres afeter each defecation.

Wood chips: 8% moisture, density 140[g/Lt], c:n 560, %N = 0,09%
-Results: 30% moisture, C:N 21 if 2 litres of chips area added.



I'm makins this work with a group of engineers here in Valparaíso, Chile for install units in rural areas. We already installed a few units that works, but definitely by dehydration and maybe a little composting (we used sawdust, crushed barks and ashes, in UDDT units, and a little size redution was observed). We are making a technical evaluation with the composting process, motivated by the 90% volume reduction reported by Clivus Multrum, the better sanitary results, and better fertilizer powers. But it's not practical having 90% of size reduction, if I have to put a bucket of more than a gallon of dry leaves after each defecation(only imagine doing that thing after poo, it's simply not comfortable). Maybe with an automatic system with a flush with crushed leaves afeter defecation or huge chambers for reaching thermofilic compost it's gonna work, but we have to make ir cheap.

Also you have to know that is is gonna be in rural areas, with old people, who haven't heard anything about ecosan systems in his life, and also, a high-society school boy (me) is gonna come and tell him how he has to poo? It has to be an easy task, and it doesn't get easier if I have to indicate the new users "you have to add this bucket of leaves after each defecation, and 200 cc of water, in this brand new toilet that separates you're urine (Diverting urine by the first time IT'S A SHOCK FOR THE USER),and also, you have to full this tank with leaves every week"

Not diverting urine it's not a choice, maybe it's gonna increase moisture, but with the high nitrogen content, it's gonna increase the carbon-rich materiales required (80% of nitrogen in sewers comes from urine).

Hope you speak spanish, we were on TV YEAAAAHHH: thank you susana partners for your interest in helping me with my research, i share a little note about us:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • joeturner
  • joeturner's Avatar
  • Posts: 717
  • Karma: 23
  • Likes received: 185

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio (carbon to nitrogen ratio) for composting processes

I'm definitely not pretending to be any kind of expert in the use of UDDTs, so I can only concur with Chris on that. In my view, a properly functioning composting system is always preferable to the processes going on in a UDDT - but I know others think differently.

I had some experience of co-composting faeces (actually it was pressed sludge) with paper waste and it didn't go well. I'd have to look up to see if there are studies of it, but I think the physical properties of the paper makes it less useful in a composting scenario than other potential materials.

As Chris and Elisabeth have indicated above, it is entirely possible that the original questioner is mistaking the processes inside a UDDT for composting.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
  • canaday
  • canaday's Avatar
  • A biologist working toward sustainability
  • Posts: 400
  • Karma: 18
  • Likes received: 175

Re: Toilet paper C:N ratio

Dear Rodrigo,

I agree with Joe that it does not make much sense to add kitchen waste to the feces. One of the goals of the UDDT is to keep the volume of dangerous material as small as possible, to facilitate storage and/or treatment. A variation on this that I would recommend would be to compost the kitchen waste separately and then use the finished and dried compost as cover material in the UDDT (or potentially mixed into other materials). This would have the advantage of absorbing smells better and inoculating the fresh feces with beneficial decomposer microbes.

The paper will help to absorb liquids, thus it should contribute to air flow through the pile, although maybe not as much as bulkier materials like sawdust or rice hulls. Joe mentions that paper retains moisture, but I would suggest that this should be less so than the feces themselves. Please share with us, Joe, any more detailed data on this that you may have.

Drying versus composting is a gradient rather than a dichotomy. A certain amount of microbial decomposition likely occurs in all the various UDDTs that we discuss, unless it is in the northern winter and everything freezes or the fecal chamber is a hot, drying oven (which would not smell very nice for the user). Decomposition can especially occur if the fecal container is permeable to water vapor getting out and oxygen getting in.

Let's remember that one of the advantages of UDDTs, compared to flush toilets, is that the user is free to clean him or her self with a variety of things, including selected leaves and corn cobs, which can go in together with the feces and receive all the same treatment. This is an important consideration for isolated communities where toilet paper is not sold, or for poor people who may have to choose between buying toilet paper or food. (Here in Tropical America, the leaves of Piper auritum are excellent, as they are are wide, soft, velvety and perfumed of anise.) Leaves may add a little bit of humidity and nitrogen, but this should not be of great concern.

Rodrigo, please tell us more about your project and how dry toilets are advancing in Chile.

Best wishes,
Chris Canaday
Conservation Biologist and EcoSan Promoter
Omaere Ethnobotanical Park
Puyo, Pastaza, Ecuador, South America
inodoroseco.blogspot.com

Please Log in to join the conversation.

You need to login to reply
Page selection:
Share this thread:
Recently active users. Who else has been active?
Time to create page: 0.085 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum