SuSanA - Forum Kunena Site Syndication Sat, 29 Nov 2014 02:14:57 +0000 Kunena 1.6 SuSanA - Forum en-gb Re: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: aasimmansuri
Thanks for showing interest in our project, yes you have rightly mentioned that this system has its application in all the urban local bodies (around 400 +) of Gujarat and Maharasthra. Also, septic tanks in India are considered as an integral part of the urban sanitation systems. As per recent census of India 2011 information around 38 % of urban households in India are dependent on septic tanks.

As our system is meant for outcome indicators health impacts are not included. Also as hygiene is not captured as most ULBs do not have direct program's for that. Open defecation is estimated indirectly from information on household and community toilets as the system is based on data from the suppliers which are urban local governments. Unit costs and complaint redressal are captured. These details can be viewed for each city on our web portal.

We will definitely keep you all posted regarding our project milestones and activities

Enabling environment Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:56:07 +0000
Re: Performance Indicators for Small Town Sanitation (in Uganda) - by: muench
You mentioned that the performance indicators set up by the PAS project in India to monitor performance of water & sanitation utilities / services ( are not really very applicable to your situation with small towns in Uganda.

You said it's because you have a much higher ratio of on-site sanitation than those towns in India.

Could you please clarify to me why the indicators used in the PAS project are not applicable (even if the ratios are different, they surely also included indicators for on-site sanitation, as their system is very comprehensive, I thought?).

For everyone's information Aasim Mansuri from the PAS project has recently sent me some new presentations about their project which are accessible here in the SuSanA library:

Enabling environment Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:00:07 +0000
Re: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: F H Mughal
The PAS system is interesting and is fairly comprehensive. As I understand, the system has its application in all urban local bodies in Gujarat and Maharashtra. What were the results and outcomes, and how the assessment enabled improvement in service delivery?

PAS is for “urban” water supply and sanitation, but some of the components (e.g., septic tanks) shows that it includes “rural” water supply and sanitation, as well.

Please comments on the absence of the following aspects:

Incidence of waterborne diseases – reduction of the diseases can be a good indicator

Hygiene – hygiene is an important adjunct of water and sanitation

Impact on reduction of open defecation (OD) – Reduction of OD cases is a useful indicator

Unit production costs ($/cubic meter of water) – Reduction in unit production costs in water treatment reflects efficiency

Stakeholders’ satisfaction – Increased percentage of stakeholders’ satisfaction, or conversely, increased complaints from the consumers, constitute a useful indicator

Please keep us posted on the milestones achieved in future.

Good luck!


F H Mughal]]>
Enabling environment Sun, 09 Nov 2014 15:32:48 +0000
Re: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: aasimmansuri
We have recently uploaded two presentations on Susana Library for you all to refer and get an update regarding our PAS project activities.

One presentation briefly describes the activities that we have taken up in the PAS project for last 5 years and other presentation briefly describes various urban sanitation activities that have been undertaken by the PAS project.

You will find this presentations on the following link:

Please do let us know if you have any feedback / comments / queries.

Enabling environment Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:09:25 +0000
Performance Indicators for Small Town Sanitation (in Uganda) - by: Kiku As the post-2015 agenda gathers momentum, the sector in Uganda is positioning itself for the discourse by making deliberate effort to gather knowledge on some of the key issues such as FSM, hygiene (hand washing and MHM), equity, etc.

One area that seems to have substantial gaps is setting up systems to track and evaluate performance of sanitation and hygiene interventions in small towns, where on-site sanitation systems are dominant. I have perused through some of the good work on performance assessment such as the PAS Project in India ("local action" indicators attached; see also, which proposes indicators at various levels, but the context we are working with is different. Especially the prevalence of faecal sludge vis-à-vis wastewater.

Are there individuals/organizations with experience on M&E systems for small town sanitation? Typical settings would have a populations of 5,000 to 25,000 with reliance on on-site sanitation well above 95% (and not about to change soon going by sector history).

Sanitation, especially enforcement and safe disposal, falls within the mandate of local government (urban authorities), but other actors also have a role to play; i.e. Ministry of Water and Environment for public facilities; Ministry of Health for household sanitation (albeit more of awareness creation, and minimal hardware); and the Ministry of Education for school sanitation. An integrated approach such as the town sanitation planning would bring all the aforesaid actors on board, but there is little sector experience on the same. And that is a discussion for another day.

Enabling environment Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:06:41 +0000
Re: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: aasimmansuri
Thank you for your interest in PAS project of CEPT University.

The indicators that we have been using in our work are mentioned in this link (go in framework section of performance assessment tab). More recently, we are developing indicators for onsite sanitation assessment and we will be sharing this soon. We will be happy to receive your comments. Hopefully, the post-2015 sanitation monitoring can use some of these indicators.

Regarding shared toilets, we are trying out this idea in a few small and medium towns in Maharashtra, India. We strongly believe that shared sanitation facilities provided by public agencies are not viable. Its life cycle cost is much higher and it is not safe. Instead, we promote one family- one toilet concept. However, in dense communities, where there is no space in the house for a toilet, we advocate provision of a toilet for 2-3 families, which is collectively owned and maintained by them. In the towns, where we are working, we have designed an incentive subsidy scheme, where a family without a toilet is given a small grant by the local government. So if more households are willing to share the toilet the subsidy amount per toilet will increase.

Enabling environment Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:09:33 +0000
Re: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: KimAndersson Thanks for introducing your project, which is an exciting long-term and large-scale effort. Would be interesting to hear about some of the insights you have gained so far. Hence, here’s a set of questions that I hope you can comment on.

Regarding the performance monitoring, what are the indicators you have applied to follow-up sanitation? What are your strategies for collecting data? Have you implemented any innovating ways of monitoring? This is a most relevant international matter today, since the Post-2015 process is ongoing with new Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) coming up soon. There is a need to develop indicators that actually measure the sustainability of sanitation systems and allow for feasible monitoring mechanisms.

I’m also interested to know more about your 2-3 family-shared toilets. What is your learning from this approach? For example, how do you group families? Or do you only involve relatives? How do they manage ownership and O&M? What type of sanitation systems are you implementing/considering?

Best regards,
Enabling environment Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:03:44 +0000
Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation in India (CEPT University, India) - by: aasimmansuri
Here are some details on the Performance Assessment System (PAS) Project that aims to develop appropriate methods and tools to measure, monitor and improve delivery of water and sanitation in urban India. The Project has three major components of performance measurement, monitoring and improvement. It covers all urban local bodies (ULBs) in Gujarat and Maharashtra.

Looking forward to discussions on the forum.

Title of grant: Performance Assessment Systems (PAS) for Urban Water Supply and Sanitation

Name of lead organization: CEPT University

Primary contact at lead organization: Dr. Meera Mehta / Dr. Dinesh Mehta

Grantee location: Ahmedabad, Gujarat , INDIA

Developing country where the research is being or will be tested: INDIA

Short description of the project:
Lack of reliable and updated information about operational and financial performance of urban water supply and sanitation services poses a key challenge in improving access to the poor and increasing efficiency of service delivery in India. New investments in urban water and sanitation are made, without proper performance assessment of existing system

The Performance Assessment System (PAS) Project has developed appropriate methods and tools to measure, monitor and improve delivery of water and sanitation in urban India. The Project has three major components of performance measurement, monitoring and improvement. It covers all urban local bodies (ULBs) in Gujarat and Maharashtra. The project team has worked with the state and local governments to institutionalize the performance assessment system (PAS). More details on

In recent years, the project team has focused on sanitation related activities. These include developing measurement systems and indicators for on-site sanitation, preparing and implementing city sanitation plans, developing tools for assessing sanitation improvement actions, and developing mechanisms for financing urban sanitation

The main aim of the proposed project is to develop and test, through implementation in two states in India, a performance assessment system for urban water supply and sanitation. The working hypothesis of this project is that a well performing and sustainable PAS will make service delivery more efficient, equitable and sustainable.

Objectives: The key objectives of the project are :

o Objective 1 : To develop and implement a performance measurement system for regular and reliable UWSS information
o Objective 2: To analyze and share results on a regular basis with ULBs, state government agencies and other stakeholders through performance monitoring and dissemination system for use in decision making and providing incentives.
o Objective 3: To facilitate development of performance improvement plans by urban local bodies with support from state government, NGOs and private sector.
o Objective 4: To develop an assessment framework and financially feasible planning approach for citywide sanitation

Start and end date: 1st December, 2008 to 30th June, 2016

Grant type: Research grant (see here in BMGF database :

Grant size: USD 9,840,056

Funding for this research currently ongoing: yes

Research or implementation partners: Urban Management Centre (UMC), Ahmedabad, Gujarat and All India Institute of Local Self Government (AIILSG), Mumbai, Maharashtra

Links, further readings – results to date:
Project website:
Entry in SuSanA library:

Current state of affairs:
Well established systems of information and tools for performance monitoring and improvement have been set up in both the states. Apart from this during the course of the work in both the states, it was found that in nearly two-thirds of cities, on-site sanitation is practiced, and very little information is available for this aspect. Thus in January 2012, CEPT started to work on Sanitation related issues, focusing on sanitation assessment, developing sanitation plans and looking at governance of sanitation at local level. During the past years, various activities have been initiated on sanitation by the CEPT team, viz. development of a citywide sanitation assessment framework, preparation of city sanitation plans, exploring private sector engagement to improve service delivery and studies on regulation of onsite sanitation systems.

Biggest successes so far:
Over the five years period, CEPT has worked closely with state governments of Gujarat and Maharashtra and over 400+ cities in these two states to generate information. There is now a well-established system of information and tools for performance monitoring and performance improvement have been developed. State PAS/SLB Cells have been formed in both states for regular performance monitoring and support preparation of PIPs. They have actively coordinated data collection.

The PAS web portal ( is fully operational and provides public access to performance information for last 5 years for 419 ULBs in the two states. Recently, information from other Indian States has been added. I tis now the largest information base for urban water and sanitation in India. PAS has also strengthened the data visualization component by developing interactive dashboards. These dashboards enable review of state and local level indicators by State and local Governments to monitor performance

Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India has designated CEPT as National Technical Support Centre for benchmarking of water and sanitation. The PAS team has provided training to other States to adopt the PAS framework. PAS will also coordinate and support activities of the National Steering Committee on benchmarking water and sanitation

A decision-support model for Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) developed by PAS project team was used for city sanitation plan (CSP) exercises. The PIP model simulates outcomes and financial implications of a comprehensive set of actions to improve performance of water and sanitation services in municipalities. The model links capital and operational costs of improvement actions with overall municipal finance. It identifies financing options and tariff revisions for various options. A dashboard of the model enables quick comparison of major options.

Challenges :

Onsite Sanitation system: Most cities in India have either full on-site sanitation systems or mixed system with both sewerage and on-site system. However, there are no performance indicators (or benchmarks) to assess on-site sanitation. PAS team is working on developing a set of performance indicators across the sanitation value chain for non-networked cities. However, the information is not readily available with service providers.

Moving away from community/shared toilets: Moving to Open Defecation Free (ODF) cities has emerged as an important agenda our sanitation work. PAS Project has provided support to a number of cities in developing plans for making their cities ODF. Current approach in India is to provide “community toilets”. Our work suggests that this is not an appropriate strategy, as it has high costs –both financial and administrative – to the local government. Instead providing a toilet for each family has a far greater benefit. This idea is being tested in two cities, where the Local City Council have adopted a programme that focuses on facilitating family or group toilets (shared by 2 or 3 families) and agreed to provide partial funds form council budget. Will this programme work?

Sanitation Financing: The current mindset of most local governments is to wait for grants from state or national governments to undertake sanitation projects. This has been the fate of over 200 city sanitation plans in India that were prepared with expectation of large grants from the national government. However, this has not happened. Instead of large-scale centralized systems, we have advocated on-site sanitation. An advantage in such a system is that the investment costs are shared by public agencies and households. But how can cities and household mobilise additional resources? We are working with cities to explore PPPs for Integrated fecal sludge management (IFSM) and consumer finance for own toilets. We are also working at state and national levels to explore mechanisms of “Urban Sanitation Fund” to leverage private funding from corporates (CSR) and social investors (foundations, high net worth individuals, etc.)]]>
Enabling environment Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:15:48 +0000
Re: Data acquisition and field support for sanitation projects (UKZN, South Africa) - Web page development - by: ChrisBuckley The PRG web page is now available at

Over the next month additional data and videos will be added.

Enabling environment Sun, 13 Jul 2014 10:58:56 +0000
Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator (University College London, UK) - by: luizacampos
Very interesting work done by Sharma and colleagues. It seems to contains information we have been looking for.

So yes, we can build in NewSan (Prototype) the technologies Mr Sharma's group has analysed. I will get in touch with him.

Thanks a lot.

Enabling environment Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:01:11 +0000
Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator (University College London, UK) - by: AquaVerde May you answer my question?

Additional is your upcoming system flexible enough, to incorporate future "new" developments like this: “Carbon is Money” From Wastewater to Energy – Exploration of Concepts ?

Detlef SCHWAGER]]>
Enabling environment Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:52:37 +0000
Re: Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator (University College London, UK) - by: dorothee.spuhler
Nelson from SEI asked some questions at the end of the re-recording of Luiza's presentation. As volume is quite low, we thought it would be worth to complete the write-up also with a summary of this discussion.
So, here you go…

How do you acquire the input values in order to run your simulations?

The model is based on a simple Material Flow Analysis which needs for the simulation input data and process in order to calculate output flows
Currently all the data used was collected from the literature: input concentrations as well as what happens in the process: e.g. energy consumption or production, decay of nitrogen etc.
Currently only examples were simulated based on the data from literature (e.g. the one's you have see on the diagrams in the presentations).
In the future, the model needs to be validated and calibrated. For this, case studies are needed from places were systems with similar outputs as NewSan produced are implemented. The problem is that most of the technologies, NewSan is looking at only exist at pilot scale and even data from pilot scale does vary if you scale up.

What are the Phosphorus and Nitrogen flows through the system on the slide with the UDDT?

The slide is only showing CAPEX and OPEX. But the simulator can also calculate phosphorus and nitrogen flow or any other of the currently available options (e.g. coliforms, carbon, BOD). They are calculated based on the settlement data which determines the inflows and the transformation and transportations they undergo through the systems.

Are you aware of the washcost project IRC has in the Netherlands has been carrying out?

Yes, and washcosts data was used in the in the work so far. A future collaboration would be welcome but currently, the NewSan Prototyp needs funds.
To have financial resources would help the team to keep the development going more and to validated and calibrate it.
See e.g. here for more info on washcost:


So if you have are working on the implementation of the “new generation of sanitation systems” and have a case study or data to offer to the team, especially on anaerobic digestion or biochar production, let them know...

Cheers, Dorothee]]>
Enabling environment Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:09:16 +0000
Re: Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator - Sankey diagrams - by: AquaVerde
If possible may you in-cooperate results and calculations by Mr. Sharma and colleagues in your project “NewSan” simulation tool? Is your coming system flexible enough to do so?

Waste to Energy, Technical and Financial Analysis, India
Technical and financial analysis for opportunities and obstacles associated with various FS to energy processing options

Although it is stated, all is based on typical Indian condition, in my educated guessing this conditions are very representative to too many places on earth.

Detlef SCHWAGER]]>
Enabling environment Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:59:32 +0000
Re: Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator - Sankey diagrams - by: masch What sort of experience do others have with the use of Sankey diagrams?

Many regards


Dr. Manfred Schütze
ifak - Institut fuer Automation und Kommunikation e.V. Magdeburg
Wasser und Energie / Water and Energy / Agua y Energía
Werner-Heisenberg-Str. 1
39106 Magdeburg
Tel.: +49-391-9901470, -9901481
Fax: +49-391-9901590
E-Mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Enabling environment Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:17:37 +0000
Re: Modelling the next generation of sanitation systems - NewSan Simulator (University College London, UK) - by: dorothee.spuhler
„Does the thickness of the arrows have any significance?“
Manfred explained that the results are displayed in “Sankey” diagrams. This means that the width of the arrows is shown proportionally to the flow quantity (nutrients, energy, etc.)]]>
Enabling environment Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:12:34 +0000