“The ambitions you want for sanitation should be the ones you want for yourself,"

  • Doreen
  • Doreen's Avatar
    Topic Author
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 186
  • Karma: 24
  • Likes received: 72

“The ambitions you want for sanitation should be the ones you want for yourself,"

Dear All,

I just thought I would leave this here. Quote from The United Nations Deputy Secretary General Amina J Mohammed.



Best regards,

Doreen

Doreen Mbalo

Sustainable Sanitation Programme and Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) Secretariat
Advisor
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
E This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The following user(s) like this post: Marijn Zandee, JKMakowka, indiebio
You need to login to reply
  • JKMakowka
  • JKMakowka's Avatar
  • Long-term forum user
  • Just call me Kris :)
  • Posts: 808
  • Karma: 34
  • Likes received: 247

Re: “The ambitions you want for sanitation should be the ones you want for yourself,"

However, with current tech. that might be unaffordable for many even with reasonable subsidies. I wouldn’t mind using something like the Sato pan though I guess :)

Krischan Makowka
Microbiologist & emergency WASH specialist
You need to login to reply
  • muench
  • muench's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Freelance consultant (former roles: program manager, lecturer, process engineer)
  • Posts: 2079
  • Karma: 43
  • Likes received: 619

Re: “The ambitions you want for sanitation should be the ones you want for yourself,"

Naaa, I am not sure I really agree with the statement from the video: "let's give them the toilets that we use - that's really the ideal".

Really? Many of us wealthy people use flush toilets connected to a sewer system. But is this necessarily "the ideal"? We shouldn't think of technology but of function. That was Bill Gates' idea with "reinventing the toilet", to come up with something better than the flush toilets we have now which are so expensive and so wasteful...

How about rather: "let's ensure they (the poor) can afford a toilet that they like and which is pleasant to us".
(saying "let's give them" is also wrong in my opinion, as it cements the donor - beneficiary relationship rather than business - client).

I do agree that simple pit latrines are usually not what people want, not aspirational and not all that desirable (unless perhaps with a SaTo pan!!). Having a toilet outside of your own house is unlikely to be all the appealing. We all want one right next to our bedroom, don't we? But it doesn't necessarily have to be a flush toilet.

I do like the thinking though of promoting sanitation/hygiene products that we would like to buy for ourselves. To give an example from the menstrual hygiene field: That's why I find e.g. menstrual cups or the new high-tech period panties (see here ) easier to promote than e.g. reusable sanitary pads.

Dr. Elisabeth von Muench
Independent consultant
Community manager of this forum via SEI
(see: www.susana.org/en/resources/projects/details/127 )
Wikipedian, co-founder of WikiProject Sanitation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sanitation

Location: Frankfurt, Germany
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Twitter: @EvMuench, website:...
The following user(s) like this post: Marijn Zandee
You need to login to reply
Share this thread:
Time to create page: 0.256 seconds